Is it the language or the rite that is the most important element of the Mass?
Or...
Can there possibly be something else?
Sunday, July 01, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A blog which aims to suggest to its readers that the externals of religion, while important, are not the be all and end all. As Psalm 4 tells us 'O men, how long will your hearts be hardened, will you love what is futile and seek what is false?' At the same time it will be keeping an eye opened for other stories of interest.
1 comment:
Language or Rite? Firstly, I simply love the Mass. English or Latin, Tridentine or Novus Ordo, as long as it is celebrated correctly and reverently sans abuses or improv on the celebrant part is wonderful. I think the Tridentine Rite emphases the sacrificial nature of the Mass more and offers more periods of natural silence for personal prayer and meditation. I have often wondered what the Mass would be like if you made a authentic english translation of the 1962 Missal and use that Rite otherwise unchanged. So, to answer your question, I'd have to say Rite first, language second.
MJW
Post a Comment